A flamingo standing on one leg is a magnificent picture. A flurry of
them in flight is a splendid view. But both sights are not comparable
to the picturesque flamboyance of flamingos wading in Lake Natron.
With that rare splendour, these aquatic birds of the Phoenicopteridae
family are unwittingly protecting the local communities from a
threatening financial drought if the government builds a soda ash plant
in the area as planned. The soda ash industry was initially put forward
by Tata Chemicals Ltd in collaboration with the National Development
Corporation of Tanzania (NDC). The Tata Chemicals, an Indian global company interested in chemicals, has since withdrawn from the project.
But the government presses on with the plan. “However, in May 2008
Tata announced its withdrawal from the project,” says a study
commissioned by Bird- Life International through the Wildlife
Conservation Society of Tanzania
(WCST). Mary Saiguran, a local resident of Ngarasaro Village in
Ngorongoro District says she does not want the proposed soda ash
facility because it could change Lake Natron’s state and drive away the
Lesser Flamingo, which tourists come to see.
Ms Saiguran was speaking on August 28 in Dar es Salaam
at a workshop on a Comparative Study of Costs and Benefits of Soda ash
Mining and Promotion of Ecotourism and Sustainable Use of Natural
Resources in Lake Natron Basin, Tanzania. The workshop was organised by
Wild Conservation Society of Tanzania (WCST) and BirdLife International
who had commissioned the study. “If flamingos go away I shall miss the
money I get from tourists who come to see the birds,” she says.
“I, like other Maasai women in the area sell baskets to tourists and
other products we make with beads and get a lot of money.”
Environmentalists say the birds like the caustic lake, because they feed
on algae growing in it. They, however, argue that chemical water from
the proposed soda plant will end up in the lake, changing its salinity.
That will drive away about 2 million Lesser Flamingo, which come there
annually to breed.
“Vulnerability of the Lesser Flamingo is emphasized by the fact that
all the East African population is dependent on one single site – Lake
Natron for all its breeding requirements,” reveals Paul Nyiti, Senior
WCST Conservation Officer. Tanzanian Government and the Indian company
Tata Chemicals put forward proposals to build a large-scale industrial
plant to extract soda ash from Lake Natron’s water, via a network of
pipes across the surface of the lake.
They also plan to construct a new road and a rail infrastructure to
serve the soda ash plant. All this development runs counter to the
livelihood of the local communities, who argue that the end result will
affect the pasture of their livestock in addition to other harms. Lake
Natron Conservation Project Manager, Francis Makari, also the area’s
local community representative at the workshop held at Utalii College in
the city, says that, despite the economic benefits the government
trumpets to come from the soda ash facility, the local people do not
want the project because of American dollars tourists buy their products
with.
In the villages of Ngaresaro and Magadini women build grass huts or
bomas tourists stay in for pay. The local community need awareness to
welcome the proposed project. But in the ten months that the educational
programmes were launched not all the 34 targeted villages were covered,
with notably Longido and Namanga left out, prompting a call by some
locals for a meeting with stakeholders and government officials to know
the benefits of the proposed plant.
“We don’t understand the benefit of the soda industry,” a Lake Natron
local resident Musa Nanyambok Lous, Chairman of Magadini Village said.
But Mr Makari warns the stakeholders to prepare for fierce resistance
because most members of the local communities have already tasted the
crisp feel of the dollar note and depend almost 75 per cent on the
tourism industry for their daily living. Lake Natron is RAMSAR
Convention site, is a breeding site for 75 per cent of the world’s
flamingos.
The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, called the
Ramsar Convention, is an intergovernmental treaty that provides the
framework for national action and international cooperation for the
conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources. The Ramsar
Convention is the only global environmental treaty that deals with a
particular ecosystem. The treaty was adopted in the Iranian city of
Ramsar in 1971 and the Convention’s member countries cover all
geographic regions of the planet.
The Convention’s mission is “the conservation and wise use of all
wetlands through local and national actions and international
cooperation, as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development
throughout the world”. Lake Natron, one of such ecosystems, is said to
be home to about 2 million lesser flamingoes, which come there annually
to breed and cover it in a huge blanket of pinkish white with black
beaks, long red legs and wings fringed with black plumes. The lesser
flamingo aside, Lake Natron attracts tourists with its hot springs and
wild life.
The local community grow onions and maize which they irrigate with
water from the lake. They fear production of soda from the lake will
change all that, ruining tourism and pasture for their livestock. But
proponents of the project, keen on it, say the local communities can
benefit from gross income of casual labouring during construction phase
estimated to be 10 per cent of fixed capital investment, equivalent to
US$13,050,000.
“The net benefits from casual labouring during the construction phase
of two years for staff sourced locally from villages within Lake Natron
were estimated at US$8,352,000,” the CBA report says. Still, the
results of the study analysis indicate that the soda plant would deliver
far worse returns for local people. “When the WTP values were used in
the valuation of direct use and intrinsic values, the losses of benefit
at local, national, regional and international levels due to
construction of soda ash plant in Lake Natron were estimated to amount
to Net Present Value (NVP) of about US$49.8m or US$101.7m for ‘low
impact’ and ‘high impact’ scenarios respectively at a social discount
rate of 10 per cent equivalent to 50 years,” the report says.
The study found out that the soda as mining project is not worth
undertaking at the present level of soda ash market price of US$270 per
tonne and a production level of 500,000 tonnes per annum. The costs of
the soda ash mining were disproportionate to the benefits of
implementing the project at a social discount rate of 10 per cent even
when the investor was as assumed to be exempt from paying royalty and
VAT.
“The project remained economically unjustifiable even when the
investor was as assumed to be exempt from incurring the cost of
construction/ rehabilitation of the road to plant and Tanga to Arusha
Railway,” the study reveals. Although production arrangements were
worth undertaking, they essentially require that the project should
operate at the highest production capacity of 1,000,000 metric tonnes
per annum throughout the project’s life.
According to the study, experience suggests that this production
level is both socioeconomically and environmentally damaging and too
hypothetical at the present levels of demand, technology and costs of
production, the study says. The opportunistic price of US$412 would
trigger more soda ash suppliers and lower the price. The huge expected
soda ash price is not likely to occur soon either because of stringent
competition from China and other producers of synthetic soda ash.
The local community prefer conservation of the lake to the soda ash
project. “In fact they welcomed our Conservation project with a highly
positive attitude and their support is high. In short they don’t want
the industry at all,” Makari explains. Most members to the workshop
advise a more careful study of the project. Sadiki Lotha Laiser, Wild
Life Division of the Ministry of Natural Resources says a more detailed
understanding of the project with relation to the local villages need be
done.
A lecturer at the Sokoine University of Agriculture, Dr Kadigi says
the project was a paradox and was likely to cause more damage and was
therefore a threat to the integrity of the lakes ecosystem. Members also
gave a caution. The soda ash project appeared more deceptive given the
question of how the local people will benefit. “Shinyanga Goldmine
enjoys the abundance of fresh water from Lake Victoria
and electricity, but the local community around them do not and fetch
water miles away,” said James Lembeli, Kahama MP, who was also invited
to the workshop.
One Engineer Bocco, Deputy Treasurer of Wildlife Conservation Society
of Tanzania says there has been a discovery that the person who owns
the soda ash firm in Kenya
is the one who wants to build another one in Lake Natron. Some
stakeholders think the Lake Natron project was launched on the wrong
advice to the government. “We must always be careful with what advice we
give to the President,” he said. Nyiti reminds: Ecosystem in several
parks in Tanzania is at least partly dependent on the population of
flamingoes due to their beauty.”
By LAWI JOEL, Tanzania Daily News
No comments:
Post a Comment